Thursday, February 24, 2011
Chicago tunes out election coverage
Chicago elected new mayor Rahm Emmanuel in a historic election - the first in 22 years without the name Daley on the ballot. But in the end, the ratings for Chicago's broadcast TV stations looked like what you normally find on a Tuesday night as low voter turnout morphed into a huge viewer tuneout.
WGN-TV pulled an upset of sorts Tuesday in the 9 p.m. time period beating all competitors with a 3 rating and 7 share in the key target demo of adults 25-54, and a 6.3 household (HH) rating. WLS-TV (with a combo of election coverage and What Would You Do?) did a 2.8/7 in the key target demo and a 3.5 HH rating. Next up was WMAQ-TV (with a combo of election coverage and Parenthood), with a 2.3/6 in the key target demo and a 3.9 HH rating. Fourth was WBBM-TV - who moved up prime time programming up an hour so it could provide election coverage at 9 p.m. - notched an unimpressive 1.5/4 in the key target demo and a 4.6 HH rating, meaning the viewership skewed much older toward the 55+ crowd. Last and certainly least was WFLD-TV, with a 1.2/3 in the key target demo and a 2.3 HH rating. In fact, a Seinfeld repeat on sister station WPWR-TV beat WFLD's newscast in the third quarter hour (Seinfeld is moving off WPWR on March 21 and moving to WCIU at 9 p.m.)
At 10 p.m., the numbers were pretty much reflected what you would find on a normal weeknight: WLS lead in among adults 25-54 and in households with a 4.5/13 and a 9.6 rating, respectively, with WMAQ second and WBBM third.
While Rahm Emmanuel's victory wasn't really in doubt, the early projection from CNN and other sources - 45 minutes after the polls closed (basically before Sue Sylvester can clobber anyone on Glee with her megaphone) caught local news operations by surprise, and likely suppressed ratings for election coverage. CLTV and WMAQ's Non-Stop Chicago channel provided live coverage throughout the evening.
In all, Chicago's five major news stations combined for a 23.8/37 at 9 when the mayor-elect made his acceptance speech - down considerably from the 43.3 rating for Richard M. Daley's victory on April 4, 1989 - at a time when much of Chicago still wasn't wired for cable TV and your video alternatives were either VHS or Beta, and your computer (if you could afford one) was either was an IBM PC or an Macintosh II.
The numbers for WBBM and WFLD are clearly disappointing (regardless of what Lazare has to say about WBBM - advertisers don't buy household ratings.) Despite Fox's (at least when American Idol is on) successes in prime-time, it hasn't translated to additional viewers for WFLD, and it's also a problem of WBBM, though to a lesser extent. There is no excuse for a station's late newscast to lose a significant portion of viewers from a prime-time lead-in - especially since local news is "appointment TV" viewing for many.
Ratings information in this article provided by Nielsen Media Research via Chicagoland Radio and Media, Chicago Sun-Times, and Robert Feder from Time Out Chicago. Photo courtesy of Chicago Tribune.
Posted by T Dog at 11:48 PM